<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taylors Falls Mike&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mncrimp.com/2009/03/taylors-falls-mikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mncrimp.com/2009/03/taylors-falls-mikes/</link>
	<description>minnesota based bouldering and climbing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:11:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.mncrimp.com/2009/03/taylors-falls-mikes/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mncrimp.com/?p=245#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, in my opinion the traversing line is probably around V5 or so. Maybe a bit harder. The feet are just horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, in my opinion the traversing line is probably around V5 or so. Maybe a bit harder. The feet are just horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.mncrimp.com/2009/03/taylors-falls-mikes/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mncrimp.com/?p=245#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Hey Neil,

Yeah, I was out there again today and realized we had done different variations..  The one I was talking about was a direct sit start. The traversing line was cool though. I hadnt noticed that possibility before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Neil,</p>
<p>Yeah, I was out there again today and realized we had done different variations..  The one I was talking about was a direct sit start. The traversing line was cool though. I hadnt noticed that possibility before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.mncrimp.com/2009/03/taylors-falls-mikes/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mncrimp.com/?p=245#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Hi Anthony-
That could be right too.. I wonder if we&#039;re talking about the same thing though.. I started about 8 feet left of the stand start and the starting foot beta from there wasn&#039;t odd at all.

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anthony-<br />
That could be right too.. I wonder if we&#8217;re talking about the same thing though.. I started about 8 feet left of the stand start and the starting foot beta from there wasn&#8217;t odd at all.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.mncrimp.com/2009/03/taylors-falls-mikes/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mncrimp.com/?p=245#comment-488</guid>
		<description>I warmed up on that line you call Tiny Bubbles. I was thinking the stand was about v2 and the sit was maybe v3-v4. I think it really only adds one hard move into the stand-start. Funny foot beta required to get off the ground though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I warmed up on that line you call Tiny Bubbles. I was thinking the stand was about v2 and the sit was maybe v3-v4. I think it really only adds one hard move into the stand-start. Funny foot beta required to get off the ground though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
